Tag-Archive for » gear «

Thursday, October 09th, 2008 | Author: Martin

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

ASC member and DP for the long-running 24 series, Rodney Charters, gave a 20+ minute interview, showing off his RED One rig that he used to travel around the world.  Equipped with the Birger Canon mount (about 1.200$), he uses the Canon 16-35mm 2.8 (1.450$), the Canon 24-70mm 2.8 (1.190$) and the Canon 70-200mm 2.8 (1.190$; $1.700 with image stabilisation) lenses. From Sim Video he has a special handle (1.200$) that doubles as EVF and battery holder.

He also had some custom made handle bar system, that does not need any rods – thus shedding off a pound or two, and saving further space (sorry, no link).

The whole set fits into one smart looking bag (the Think Tank Airport Acceleration, about 200$) that can be taken onboard a plane.

The whole interview can be found on the excellent Reel Show.

Thursday, June 19th, 2008 | Author: Martin

Sprayoff, not surprisingly a Munich-based company, builds light-weight rain deflectors. Their design is so small, that you can push it – just like a filter – into the front tray of a matte box. Power comes from the camera, so quite a speedy set up. Just over 300 gr.

sprayoffmicro3

Tuesday, April 10th, 2007 | Author: Martin

A while ago, I wrote about the Red camera project. Now they have not only released some test films, but also a price list. But first a little note on the test films. Our editing station has two 24-inch monitors. Viewing the 1080p (not i!) resolution film fills out the whole screen. Every single pixel. Plain amazing! (just for comparison, here’s a link to a framegrab from a HDV camcorder) And this camera is capable of up to 2540p – i.e. more than 4 times the resolution of 1080p. (Framegrab, Framegrab 2-you see the structure of the mascara!)

Now I am really looking forward to trying out this baby. Luckily a guy I know has pre-ordered one, so hopefully I’ll be able to do some tests. But I am sure there’ll be lots of buzz around when this camera hits the sets.

¿Quanta costa?

But how much does this miracle of tech-specs cost? Well, let’s have a look at their price list, and put together a nice package to get us up and running: more…

Thursday, February 22nd, 2007 | Author: Martin

Over at the Apple discussion board, I stumbled upon this gem:

I’m a film editor who’s had the privilege to work on $100 movies to $100 million movies.

Story is king. If your story is working, and crafted well, and paced properly, you can get away with almost whatever you want. For instance, when I cut scenes, I cut for performance… I don’t toss out takes because the glass of water was full in take one but empty in another. 9 times out of ten, even the seasoned filmmakers I’m working with never see the continuity errors because the performances are working.

Occasionally I work with first time directors, helping them with their first short. I see two main mistakes. First, they think that if someone knows how to operate [an editing station], that they are an editor. This is simply not true. I know how to use a chisel, but there is no way [...] I could sculpt the David. Editing is the same: knowing what buttons to push is the least important part of editing. Knowing how to tell a story well is everything. In fact, I know one Oscar winning editor who spent many years never touching the equipment at all. She chose the cut points, and had her assistants do the physical cutting.

The second main mistake amateur filmmakers make, IMO, is that they are not vicious enough when cutting their material. Every single frame of film you project should be conveying new information to the audience. If it’s not, get it out.

The same applies to the craft of cinematography. On discussion boards around film-making I often read questions from wanting-to-be directors on what camera they should buy, which lens they should use. Ocasionally I take the time to point out that if they want to become directors, they should not concern themselves about equipment. They should spend all the time they can on the story, developing the characters, working with the actors to achieve his/her creative vision.

Rather than buying a semi-professional camera, I advise to hire in a professional DP. S/he will not only bring superior equipment, but – most importantly – experience to the shoot. Take a good story and a knowlegdable DP, and you will have something in the cutting room to work with. Your chances of getting your film into a festival and ultimately to actually sell it, have tremendously increased.

Or you can spend all your money on a second-rate camera (never, ever believe the hype that the new HDV camera for $10.000 is as good as a $100.000 camera. But that is another blog…), and end up having to both direct and shoot on your first film. Not a good idea. Leave the technical worries to someone you can trust, and concentrate on your job: story telling.

Movie tip: Living in Oblivion by Tom DiCillo

Saturday, February 10th, 2007 | Author: Martin

I took my first photo when I was about 7 years old. Growing up in Germany of the 1970s, it was not a Kodak moment, but an Agfa moment. Anyway, the object in question was a cat on a field that apparently grasped my attention of my new Agfamatic kamera. Processing was expensive (when you had to pay it from your own pocket money), and I had another 23 pictures to take before I would get the film developed. So, it took a couple of weeks to find out that what I had seen had absolutely nothing to do with what the actual picture looked like. But still, it amazed me that it was possible to keep a moment frozen onto paper.

And that amazement never left me.

Later, when I started more seriously (as in: very interested hobbyist), I was lucky that the German Democratic Republic disappeared. With it it’s own film-making (and incredibly polluting) factory, ORWO. But between those two events, the west German mark bought incredible amounts of the ORWO black&white film. I think I must have purchased a 3-digit number of those rolls. I built myself a little robot, that would develop those film-rolls in batches of 4, thus giving me plenty of freedom to experiment.

more…

Friday, February 09th, 2007 | Author: Martin

(Back from the sun. Since 100% of you requested that I should post some pictures from the trip, I will naturally oblige. Just not yet ) )

If you think that the USD 236 to switch to the iPhone is too much, have a look at this iPhone commercial.

…oh, and if you just cannot wait for the iPhone, you can buy yourself an almost-look-alike Prada phone. Less features. But hey!

Friday, January 19th, 2007 | Author: Martin

iPhone 2005The first hypedust has settled. I was amazed at some rather strong reactions. Some commentators flared at the high price tag, seeing a demise in society per se.

Others say it is just another phone. One that does exactly what many other phones already can do.

Only few have actually seen, let alone played with, it. In a previous post I mentioned one of those lucky ones.

Since then the projected costs of the iPhone have been estimated. Projecting a whopping 50% margin. Which means that Apple has a lot of leeway if they should decide to enter a price war.

more…

Tuesday, October 10th, 2006 | Author: Martin

For my recent job in Germany, I knew that a better case for carrying the tripod was necessary. Normally, one would use a rigid plastic housing, but they weigh in at about 6kg, are difficult to transport – and are butt ugly. So I did some research, which lead to the Israeli company Kata, which has a background in supplying bags for military applications. About 5 years ago they started making bags for film- and TV professionals, and I decided to give their Triporigid 2 a try, and ordered it from B&H in New York. As always, the package arrived a few days later – thanks, UPS.

The bag is made of Condura, an extremely durable synthetic cloth material. The inside of the bag is in a british yellow, making it easy to find in dim light. It features a few extra pockets, which acommodate the tripod plate, and – in my case – some small tools. I also bought a dividing set, so that in one compartment I can carry some extra cables.

What I really came to like is the ability to convert the bag into a backpack, making it just so much easier to carry a tripod over a longer period of time – or over difficult terrain. This is so good, that I in fact find myself using the bag even in cases where I could have done easily with an unpackaged tripod.
The quality of build seems immaculate, and promises to give years of service. Recommended.

Monday, September 11th, 2006 | Author: Martin

About a year ago I first heard about the Red Camera Project. A group of dedicated people were working on making a beyond-high-def, affordable cine-style digital camera. At that time it just sounded too unreal. But since they have had a stand at the NAB, the project has gained a lot of momentum.

Personally, I took the project way more seriously when I found out that Graeme Nattress (maker of the famous filter packages for Final Cut Pro) was involved.

Some more information has been released, and they are planning on shipping the first cameras early next year. If only half of the specs make it to the finished product, it will be one amazing camera. Spotting more than 4k worth of resolution (compare this with standard definition’s tv of about 0.5k and the new hi-def of about 1k, and this by itself becomes a killer cam) at a price of $17.500, plus a f300/t2.8 lens for $5.000, you should get a working camera package for the price of a high-end DVcam system.

But the camera offers more than just resolution power. The camera will offer frame speeds of up to 60 fps (and down to 1 fps), and even higher speeds when lowering the resolution. Speaking of lowering, it will be possible to either downconvert from the full chip size (which has the same size as an 35mm gate), or to use only part of the chip. It will shoot in a variable number of formats from uncompressed RAW down to, yes, DV.

I am sure looking to their release of the first working models towards the end of this year. Might just be the successor to our trusty (if 4:2:0) DSR-570 DVcam.

Thursday, September 07th, 2006 | Author: Martin

I have been reading about their development for the past couple of years, but now it seems that the first system for fuel-cell camera batteries has hit the marked. DV magazine gives these a 3 1/2 out of 5 ratings:

Makes great sense for off the grid applications–network remotes and military use–where shipping issues and wrangling refill tanks are incidental to getting the shot. For more typical shoots, the convenience and familiarity of batteries is hard to beat.

When you are shooting in remote locations, this might be the god-send. But give that technology a bit more time, and I guess they will be the new LiIons.